70th Precinct: Gun collar lead to Cop of the Month awards

November 2, 2009 by SF

When crime spikes in an area of a precinct, a police conditions team is dispatched to catch the bad guys and bring order back to the streets.

And four members of the 70th Precinct conditions unit recently received Cop of the Month certificates for reining in some armed robbers and taking guns off the street.

In the first incident, conditions team Sgt. Joseph Durante and Officer Raymond Higgins were patrolling around Farragut Road and Bedford Avenue at about 9:25 p.m., Oct. 20, when they spotted two individuals running down Bedford Avenue and they began to give chase.

Along the way, one of the perpetrators threw a gun under a parked van, and ultimately the two crime fighters caught the suspects and recovered the gun. Later they found out the alleged robbers had held up an elderly woman on Bedford Avenue and their takes was $4.55.

The second incident occurred at about 8:45 p.m., Oct. 24, when conditions team officers Vlad Green and Joseph Imperatrice answered a call of a robbery of a cell phone near Glenwood Road and Flatbush Avenue.

Upon arriving on the scene, the two officers interviewed the victim, and then canvassed the area while the victim went over pictures with the 70th Precinct detective squad to identify the perpetrators.

Meanwhile, Green and Imperatrice looked for the bad guys as they returned to their normal patrol, and sure enough, they spotted two males who fit the description in the Junction area.

After detaining the suspects, they called the detective squad, who identified them through the pictures. The suspects were then brought to the station house, where the victim positively identified them.

Durante said in picking conditions team members, he looks for cops who have the ability to pick perps out on the street, perform utilizing proper police tactics and who know how to treat people in the street.

Green, originally from the Sheepshead Bay/Brighton Beach area, is a graduate of Lincoln High School.

Imperatrice follows in the footsteps of his father, grandfather and several uncles – all of whom were in the NYPD.

Both Green and Imperatrice have been cops for four years.

Source

Jewish News via SMS
——————-
Jewish Breaking News Blog via Facebook | Twitter | Friendfeed | Jewish Related Incidents

Yaakov (Jack) Teitel, From dentist’s son to Jewish terrorist

November 2, 2009 by SF

Yaakov (Jack) Teitel, who was arrested last month for suspected murder and a string of alleged murder attempts, was born in Miami, Florida, in November 1972, the son of Mordechai (Mark) and Devorah (Dianne), American ultra-Orthodox Jews.

His father is a dentist who served in the U.S. Navy during the Vietnam War. His mother worked as a medical secretary. When Teitel was a teenager, his family moved to Virginia Beach, near Norfolk, Virginia – the site of the largest naval base in the world.

The family lived in a sleepy neighborhood with many residents who worked for the military, and when asked, veteran residents there had a hard time placing the Teitels. The community wasn’t exactly cohesive, one resident said, expressing surprise that a terrorist might have come from the upper-middle-class locale.

Teitel, 37, began making regular trips to Israel using a tourist visa in the mid-1990s, about the time young settlers in the West Bank began to coalesce into the “hilltop youth.” He began to wander around the Hebron hills and became enamored with the farming lifestyle there.

Teitel has said that in June 1997 he killed an Arab taxi driver and a Palestinian shepherd. Two months later, the Shin Bet security service arrested him; he said during his investigation that he came to Israel precisely to carry out attacks against Palestinians, in revenge for suicide bombings.

Teitel was released, however, and returned to the United States, where he worked as a computer technician. He was subsequently informed (in 2003) that the case was closed due to lack of evidence.

He returned to Israel in 1999, moving alone to the northern West Bank settlement of Shvut Rachel; he formally immigrated to Israel in December 2000. A year later, his parents and younger sister joined Teitel in Israel, moving to Beitar Illit, an ultra-Orthodox West Bank settlement.

Teitel married Rivka Pepperman, a dance teacher from Manchester, England in 2003. The couple has four children, ranging in age from 3 months to 5 years old. His wife said he had recently been having trouble finding work.

Teitel was apparently something of an outsider in Shvut Rachel, as a result of his limited proficiency in Hebrew and what neighbors described as his introverted nature. They said he was hardly seen around the settlement, and didn’t take part regularly in services at the local synagogue.

The family “kept to themselves,” said Moshe Avitan, Teitel’s brother-in-law, who also lives in Shvut Rachel. “I was never a dinner guest at their house. I hardly know him, since he didn’t speak Hebrew very well.”

In 2006, Teitel allegedly took up terrorist activity. Why he did he choose to do so? What were his motives? Those are two questions that still have no clear answers.


http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1125243.html

Anti-Semitism charges hurled in Queens City Council race

November 2, 2009 by SF

The heated battle for a Queens seat on the City Council got even uglier Sunday as charges of anti-Semitism and voter fraud were lobbed.

Cops were called in to break up a rally for Democratic candidate Kevin Kim after supporters of his opponent, Republican Dan Halloran, crashed the event. The two are locked in an increasingly nasty campaign for Democrat Tony Avella’s seat representing Whitestone, Bayside and College Point.

Kim supporters and religious leaders began the day outside Republican headquarters, trying to make hay over Halloran’s acknowledged involvement in a pre-Christian pagan religion, Theodism.

“By comparing animal blood sacrifices with the Jewish dietary laws of keeping kosher, it’s no wonder that Dan Halloran’s religion is supported by neo-Nazis and white supremacists,” said Michael Dovid Sais, a Jewish Kim supporter.

The anti-Halloran protesters claim the religion furthers anti-Catholic and anti-Semitic views – something a Jewish leader who stood with Halloran yesterday in Whitestone was quick to dispute.

“It’s a clear sign of a desperate campaign,” said Halloran, a lawyer.

Kim and his supporters say Halloran’s campaign is full of racially coded literature aimed at scaring white voters. If elected, Kim, also a lawyer, would be the first Korean-American elected to the Council.

Halloran has painted Kim as a pawn of Asian developers, a charge Kim denies.

Yesterday, Halloran accused Kim’s campaign of voter intimidation on Primary Day.

Kim was joined at the Bay Terrace shopping center by several heavy hitters eager to vouch for his skills.

“He stands for the best of America and the best of New York,” U.S. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said.

Source

Jewish News via SMS
——————-
Jewish Breaking News Blog via Facebook | Twitter | Friendfeed | Jewish Related Incidents

200 protest New Square chicken plant

November 2, 2009 by SF

RAMAPO – Jeff Weinstein spent his Sunday afternoon marching on Route 45 to express his opposition to a kosher chicken processing plant in New Square.

“We don’t want to have a chicken slaughterhouse in our neighborhood,” said Weinstein, who lives in New Hempstead, about three-quarters of a mile from the proposed site.

“It’s going to affect our environment. It’s going to affect quality of our lives. It affects our home values,” he said.

Adir Poultry Inc. wants to build a 26,250-square-foot plant on a 1-acre lot just across from Rovitz Place off Route 45.

The Village of New Square planned a hearing for the plan Nov. 10 but called it off, saying the applicant needed more time to gather information on the environmental impact.

Opponents held their second rally Sunday, and Weinstein was one of about 200 people who participated in the protest march.

The rally, accompanied by Ramapo police, started near the corner of Eckerson Road in Hillcrest. People peacefully walked about a mile along Route 45, holding signs with phrases such as “stop the slaughterhouse.”

As they got closer to the proposed site on Route 45, protesters chanted: “No slaughterhouse! No slaughterhouse!”

Some drivers on Route 45 honked their horns in support.

Anita Bernstein of Spring Valley said the proposed plant would not be appropriate for the area.

“A chicken slaughterhouse belongs to a chicken farm,”Bernstein said. “It doesn’t belong to a residential neighborhood.”

Israel Spitzer, deputy mayor of the Village of New Square, said misleading information about the plans has been circulated in the county, causing division.

“From day one, the Village of New Square assured our neighbors that the village would listen to every concern regarding the meat processing plant. The Village of New Square has the same concerns as the neighbors to protect our own community as well as surrounding neighborhoods,” Spitzer said. “Unfortunately, some groups and people running for office have grabbed this issue as an opportunity for themselves. The involvement of outside groups has done more damage than help, and will not help the neighbors in any way.”

Two days before Election Day, some candidates running for office showed up for the march, distributing their literature.

Orangetown Supervisor Thom Kleiner, a Democrat, who is running for county executive against Republican incumbent C. Scott Vanderhoef, briefly spoke before the crowd, emphasizing that the issue needed to be addressed without dividing the community.

Many marchers said they were upset because the plan was awarded a $1.6 million grant under the state’s Restore New York program.

The state agency received letters of support for the plant from Assemblywoman Ellen Jaffee, D-Suffern; state Sen. Thomas Morahan, R-New City; Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y.; and Rep. Eliot Engel, D-Bronx.

Emilia White of Spring Valley said the money should be used for schools with financial difficulties.

“This is a wrong place for using taxpayers’ money,” said White, standing in front of the proposed site. “We can use the money to help schools.”

Source

Jewish News via SMS
——————-
Jewish Breaking News Blog via Facebook | Twitter | Friendfeed | Jewish Related Incidents

Mumbai terror attacks: they came for the Jews

November 1, 2009 by SF

Mumbai terror attacks: And then they came for the Jews Last November, more than 150 people were killed by terrorists in Mumbai. One target was a centre run by this young Jewish couple, who were murdered and perhaps tortured; miraculously, their toddler son escaped. Alastair Gee went back to Mumbai to find out what really happened that night

It is a sticky monsoon day in Mumbai, and Rabbi Avraham Berkowitz walks through the shell of Nariman House. Today, the ruined five-storey structure is testament to the ferocity of the terrorists incursion and their battle with Indian commandos. It seems impossible that anyone could have come out alive. All its window frames are empty. The lift is slumped at the bottom of its shaft, and giant, jagged chunks of the internal stairway and handrail are missing. At one point, a section of wall many metres high is gone, and the stairs would be open to the sky if not for a plastic draping. Some rooms appear almost untouched; in others, the walls are pulverised, the splatter-marks of gunfire everywhere.

Berkowitz is an American charged with recreating the Mumbai outpost of the Chabad-Lubavitch movement, a Hasidic outreach and educational organisation that sends emissaries around the world. We are in deep shock, says Berkowitz, 33. They have left a gaping hole in our community. The questions the Lubavitch movement faces are being asked of thousands of other people in the city: what to take from tragedy, how to heal, how to go forward. But even as the organisation looks to the future, uncertainty lingers over what took place during those 48 hours last November. During the siege, six foreigners were murdered inside Nariman House and three Indians were killed on the surrounding streets. Four people from inside the house survived. The building was run by Lubavitch, and was part of a larger attack on hotels and public buildings across Mumbai that resulted in the deaths of at least 166 people. But for the terrorists themselves, Nariman House was different. It was the only Jewish target, and the terrorists would be told by their handlers in Pakistan that the lives of Jews were worth 50 times those of non-Jews. The organisers had sought it out with care. Most Mumbaikars knew of the Taj Mahal hotel. Few were aware of the small Jewish centre tucked away on a backstreet.Strangely, considering Nariman Houses central place in the attacks, the events of the siege are a mystery. The full story of what happened, of how the siege began, of the hostages who escaped, and of the baby who was rescued, has never been told.

The storage room in which Sandra Samuel and Zakir Hussain were hiding from the gunmen measured 3.5 metres by 3 metres. It was lined with shelves, two windows looked out onto grubby lanes and courtyards, and there was a stainless-steel refrigerator. A banal scene, really, but it was a sanctuary. For around three hours, Sandra, 44, a plainly dressed and dedicated nanny, and Zakir, 22, a diminutive cook with delicate, almost feminine features who called himself Jackie, had been wedged behind the fridge. I called the police, I called our security guard, says Jackie. I thought this was the end for me. There was little indication of what the men upstairs were doing with the American rabbi, his wife and son, Moshe, who was almost two, and their guests. Nobody was speaking, there was just the moving of tables, shaking noises, bumps, things being pushed against the wall, things grinding, says Sandra. It was approaching 1am on Thursday, November 27, 2008.

In an adjacent building, a British woman, Anna, was crouching in the hall of her apartment with her Indian husband. Anna, 41, is a thoughtful, dark-haired teacher; she didnt want to give her real name because, in light of what happened in her adopted city, she fears becoming a target. All their windows about 21 panes had shattered from a blast after the gunshots and explosions had started at Nariman House at 9.45pm the previous night. So they waited on the floor for hours in the darkness, calling and receiving calls from worried relatives and friends, unsure of what was going on next door, even though Nariman House was only a few steps away. Curiously, the thing that struck Anna was the silence. It was as though the city beyond had ceased to exist. No car horns, no chatter from the street, none of the normal hum of a sprawling tropical metropolis. That night there was nothing except for gunshots, and they issued from Nariman House infrequently.

At around 1am there was one unforgettable sound that Sandra, Jackie and Anna would all hear. It came from Nariman House. Anna was crouching. Jackie and Sandra were hiding. And then, very clearly, a woman screamed. From that moment on, there could be little doubt about what was taking place there. She screamed as a gunshot rang out, says Anna. Then there was a real sobbing. She was crying with that kind of like she was terrified. That kind of crying.

The central figures in this story are Gavriel and Rivka Holtzberg, emissaries of the Lubavitch movement who arrived in Mumbai in 2003. They offered local and visiting Jews a free place to eat, sleep, and pray. Gabi, as he was known, was an Israeli-born New Yorker, a strapping man with a wispy reddish beard. Educated in yeshivas (traditional Jewish schools), he saw Mumbai as a chance to build something a beacon of Judaism and to fulfil Gods will. Rivka, usually called Rivki, was 28, and grew up in the northern Israeli town of Afula. In some senses, her role was traditional, and included cooking and making a welcoming home. To acquaintances, the couple seemed to complement each other. Gabi, 29, was formal where Rivki was relaxed. She was more loose, she wore trendy glasses. She was more playful. He was serious, says Hillary Lewin, an American student and sometime house guest.

Illness afflicted the Holtzberg family. Their first child, Menachem Mendel, was diagnosed with Tay-Sachs, a genetic disorder, and died in 2006, aged two. Another son, Dov Ber, also had the disease, and was to die at four years old in December 2008, a month after his parents. Amid all this, the Holtzbergs had their youngest child, Moshe, and to them he was a blessing. He did not have Tay-Sachs, and Rivki called him her malach, her angel. Everyone on their street seemed to know him. Rita Sushil Merchant, a neighbour, recalls that Moshe would stand in his window and happily shout to her the new English words he had learnt. Before the attack, he was up to banana and balloon. Whats more, Rivki was five months pregnant, another reason to be thankful.

Sandra, a Catholic Mumbaikar who previously worked as a private cook and a masseuse, started with the Holtzbergs in 2003. Jackie, a Muslim from Assam, was hired as a cook in 2006 after meeting Gabi at a sports club where he worked. Since the siege, The Sunday Times has learnt, suspicions have arisen that he may have been implicated.

According to Sandra and Jackie, Wednesday, November 26, 2008 was a day like many others at Nariman House. Rivki was very happy. That was normal, says Jackie. She was always very happy. Gavriel koshered some chickens for guests and other Jews in India, something he did often. In the evening, he exchanged a few words with Sandra about Moshe. You know, Sandra, I love this baby so much, she recalls him saying.

The Holtzbergs had guests for dinner. Among them were the American rabbis Benzion Kruman, 28, and Leibish Teitelbaum, 37. There were also two women: an Israeli grandmother, Yocheved Orpaz, 62, and Norma Shvarzblat Rabinovich, 50, from Mexico. Kruman, Teitelbaum, Orpaz and Rabinovich would not leave Nariman House alive. Another Israeli visitor, David Bialka, 52, a diamond trader from Netanya, was more fortunate. Unbeknown to the occupants of Nariman House, at around 8.30pm on Wednesday, a dinghy landed at a local jetty. It contained 10 men from Pakistan. Splitting into small groups, they fanned out across the city, some leaving bombs in taxis on the way. Each man carried an AK-47, a pistol, 8 to 12 grenades, and was in constant phone contact with handlers in Pakistan. Two of them, identified as Babar Imran of Multan and Nasir of Faisalabad little else is known about them walked a few streets to the only Jewish target. Their handlers would emphasise to them the importance of killing Jews.

The first sign that anything unusual was taking place at Nariman House varies, depending on who you ask. On the first floor, Jackie and Sandra were putting leftovers in the fridge. Perhaps Gabi and the other rabbis were studying; the visiting women from Mexico and Israel may have been using the internet. Suddenly, in the dining-room doorway that leads to the staircase, a man with a gun appeared. He was thin, light-skinned, tall. Almost like a common Indian, says Jackie. A long face, short hair. I only had a very short glance, so I couldnt see the expression on his face. In Sandras head, the events are much more confused. I dont know how it happened. It was all of a sudden, like a shot As the man raised his gun to fire, Sandra and Jackie ducked. The bullet missed them and thudded into a pillar. Somehow there was a delay, the man did not shoot again, and Jackie had time to close the door. He and Sandra ran to the row of windows that faced the street and looked out. A crowd was gathering. Motioning down to a TV repairman whose shop faced Nariman House, they asked where their buildings security guard was. The guard had left for dinner, said the repairman. Sandra and Jackie told him to call the police, and might have said more except that the agitated mass of people began throwing rocks at them. There had been gunshots from Nariman House onto the street, and they were angry. The servants retreated to the storeroom, and as they did, a terrorist lobbed a grenade at one of the doors on their floor. He didnt come and check on us, says Jackie. He must have thought we were dead.

In a bathroom on the fourth floor, Bialka, the Israeli diamond trader, was taking a shower. He had been in Mumbai on business, and was due to fly home a few hours later. The atmosphere at Nariman House that evening, he says, was congenial. He had studied the Torah after dinner, and then went upstairs to freshen up before his journey. Bialka is too traumatised by what happened next to speak about it he currently sees a therapist twice a week, and has been unable to return to work but his wife retells his story. As he stepped out of the shower, there were bangs and the sound of glass breaking. He thought that it was fireworks, his wife relates. When he heard gunshots, he realised something was very wrong. He threw on trousers and a shirt and opened the bathroom window. Luckily, it didnt have any bars on it, his wife says. The street was 10 metres below. Clutching drainpipes and balancing on air-conditioning units, Bialka half-climbed, half-slid four storeys to the ground. As he ran from Nariman House, locals seized him. Assuming he was a terrorist, they lynched him and broke several of his bones.

Word began to spread throughout the city about what was taking place. Gabi made what was perhaps his last telephone call, to a security officer at the Israeli consulate. He said, Something has happened in Chabad house, says Orna Sagiv, the consul general. Theres a terror attack. Come and help us. The call was interrupted, however, and they were not able to re-establish contact. Two officials headed for the building. As the terrorists continued to shoot from Nariman House, the crowd retreated. A few were unlucky: Harish Gohil, a 25-year-old call-centre employee, and Salim and Maria Hararwala, 62 and 55, were shot.

Few developments gave cause for optimism. At 10.45pm, an hour after the terrorists entered the Jewish centre, a bomb they had left at a local petrol station exploded. The scream heard by Anna, the Englishwoman, came at around 1am. At that point, my blood ran cold, Anna says. In Nariman House itself, it appears that some of the hostages were killed immediately after the terrorists arrival, although this would not be known until the end of the siege. Rivki and Gabi seemed to have survived for a few hours after the terrorists arrived, according to Sandra. She says it was Rivki who screamed. Soon after, she heard Rivki shout Gabi, Gabi, stop, stop. What she wanted him to stop, I dont know, Sandra says; she suggested that Gabi had been fighting the terrorists. In the morning, there was a burst of hope. A Lubavitch leader in America, Rabbi Abraham Shemtov, had been repeatedly calling Gabis phone. At 10.30am, someone an Urdu speaker answered. Lubavitch tracked down an interpreter called PV Viswanath, a New York economics professor from Mumbai. Viswanath rang back.

Several times we asked how the rabbi was, Viswanath recalls. He said, Theyre fine. And then he said, We havent even hit him. Over the course of four or five calls with the professor, the terrorist asked to speak to an Indian government official. Strangely, he spoke with little emotion. There were no vitriolic comments against Israel or the West. Eventually Shemtov found someone, but could not patch him into the call. They were unable to contact the terrorist again.

While the terrorists focused on the phone conversations with Lubavitch, there was a lull in the gunfire. In the storeroom, Sandra and Jackie suddenly heard Moshe crying upstairs. Sandras reaction was instinctive. I heard him cry, I ran towards him, thats it, she says. I wasnt frightened. If I was frightened I would have run away. It is not known who brought Moshe down from his fifth-floor room, or why Babar Imran and Nasir did not shoot him. A sense of humanity may have prevailed. Sandra found him wandering amid the bodies of his parents and the two visiting rabbis. They were unconscious, not dead, she insists. There was no blood on the scene, not one scratch on the bodies. It was like they were sleeping. Rabbi Gabi had a little bit of blood on his leg. It is possible Sandra did not fully take in the scene, because there was certainly blood on Moshes clothing. Grabbing the baby, she and Jackie fled.

At dawn, a helicopter dropped Indian commandos onto the roof. For hours, rockets and bullets slammed into Nariman House as commandos closed in on the terrorists from the roof and the ground floor. Onlookers were stunned at the intensity of the battle. It continued until Friday evening, when the terrorists were killed by commandos. Their bodies were riddled with bullets; Nasirs arm was charred. A team of volunteers at Zaka, an emergency-response group, had arrived from Israel on Friday with Rivkis parents, and now they and others moved into the building to recover the bodies. As the Jewish Sabbath started, the siege of Nariman House was over. The rumours began shortly afterwards. Some in Mumbai heard that the hostages had been tortured, their bodies mutilated. There was speculation that the terrorists had taken mind-altering drugs before committing appalling acts, perhaps even sexually abusing the women. Few know what actually happened. The situation was complicated by the fact that no autopsies were performed on the bodies, in accordance with Jewish law.

Three days after I arrived in Mumbai, I tracked down a man who was one of the first people into Nariman House after the siege ended. It was the first time he has spoken to a journalist, and he asked me not to reveal his identity as he feared upsetting the families of the deceased. He allowed me to say that he has medical training. One windy evening, he seemed to want to talk, as if he were carrying a great burden. So we drove to a promenade ringed by skyscrapers and sat in the darkness as he told his story.

He had waited outside Nariman House as the commandos battled their way in on Friday, he said. He was optimistic; when Sandra escaped on Thursday morning, she had stated that the hostages looked unconscious rather than dead. But what he found appeared different. They were tortured very badly, he told me, speaking sombrely and matter-of-factly. He was greatly affected by what he saw, and says of the attacks organisers: I want to kill them. All the hostages had been shot, he said. Some had multiple bullet wounds. But there was more. Two of the rabbis had broken bones. The skull of one of the victims had caved in, as sometimes happens when somebody is shot in the head at close range with a rifle, except the man had not been shot in the head. The two female visitors, Orpaz and Rabinovich, were found bound with telephone cord and lying next to each other on a fourth-floor bed. One of the hostages had bruising all over her body, which the man, who is not a pathologist, said was consistent with being hit by a blunt object. There was a large cut on her thigh. And one of her eyes was out of its orbit and lying on her cheek.

It sounded so extreme, so hard to believe, that the man said in a quiet voice: I can show you photographs. So we drove through deserted night-time streets to his home, where he opened a folder on his laptop entitled Nariman House. Inside were pictures, presumably taken by the Mumbai police, of the terrorists and four of the hostages: Gabi, Teitelbaum, and the two visiting women. He did not have photos of Rivki or Kruman. The pictures are overwhelming, an almost unbearable tableau of blood and contorted bodies. Nariman House is in disarray, the furniture overturned, bullet holes everywhere. It was not hard to believe that the hostages met a horrific, drawn-out end. Based on the images and eyewitness reports, it becomes clear that most did not die in the first hail of bullets as the terrorists entered the building, as has been reported. They may have fought back. Survivors would hear Rivki through the first night, and Gabi appears to have died some time after being shot in the leg, as there is a tourniquet around his thigh. The most brutal injuries suggest torture, but the organisations that might have conclusive answers, such as Zaka, the Israeli emergency-response group, decline to comment.

I showed the images to Vincent Di Maio, a noted US pathologist. He saw in them something hinting at another controversial rumour: that hostages had been alive when commandos stormed Nariman House, but were killed by crossfire. This was the conclusion of volunteers from Zaka. One volunteer leaked the finding to the Israeli press, sparking an angry reaction from the Israeli government, which said the claims were unfounded and could harm Israeli-Indian relations.

According to Di Maio, one of the female hostages was almost certainly fired on after she died. Bullet wounds to the arm and shoulder of one of the visiting women were inflicted postmortem: Note no bleeding and visible yellow fat, he says. It is unclear who shot her. Perhaps it was the terrorists. Perhaps it was crossfire when the commandos stormed the house. If it was crossfire, then the accidental shooting of live hostages does not seem too distant a possibility.

One more question remains: how did the terrorists and their handlers apparently know the layout of Nariman House, and the schedule of its inhabitants, so well? Suspicion has fallen on Jackie, the Muslim cook. Since the siege, he says he has had about 100 interviews with police and officials, including Israelis. Solomon Sopher, a leader of the Mumbai Jewish community, says he thinks Jackie is suspected not of direct collusion with terrorists, but perhaps of unwittingly revealing information to scouts who struck up a friendship with him. Jackie denies this, and it is probable that if there were evidence against him, he would have been charged.

I met him by a rain-swept train station in the north of Mumbai. He now lives with Sandras son, and works at a falafel firm. When he speaks warmly of the Holtzbergs, he seems genuine. He has pictures of Moshe and Dov Ber, the child who died of Tay-Sachs, on his phone. He carries around a photo of Gabi. This is my rabbi, he says.

Moshe, almost three now, seems to have adjusted. He lives in Israel with Rivkis parents and Sandra. When I call, I hear Sandra and Moshe laughing in the background. Has what has happened scarred him? Moshe, Sandra says, is like a normal kid. Meanwhile, Damyanti Gohil, the mother of the call-centre worker who was shot from Nariman House, says that before the siege she would sit out, watch the buildings sparkling lights, and listen to the melodies of prayers and songs. The Holtzbergs had parties and it all seemed lovely. Now it aches so much for her to see the house through her kitchen window that she has blocked it with bricks and cement. Pinned to the cement is a photo of her son, Harish, and his wristwatch. Sitting outside her flat one evening, Gohil pulls her sari over her eyes as she starts to cry. Something should be done with that building, she says. It should be pulled down. The windows of Nariman House are dark, and the exterior panels gleam a ghostly white in the moonlight.

Surprisingly, considering the grim history, dozens of Lubavitch couples have applied to replace the Holtzbergs in Mumbai. The light has to shine again from Chabad house, Berkowitz says. So far, nearly $1m has been pledged for a new centre. Recently Berkowitz led five visitors, all western Jews who knew the Holtzbergs, up the crumbling staircase at Nariman House. Amid the devastation, traces of the Holtzbergs linger, as if they were there only yesterday. Two bottles of medication remain in one of the fridges. On the top floor, in Moshes room, a painted Hebrew alphabet scrolls along a wall, and by the door are pencil marks where Rivki recorded Moshes height. In the Holtzbergs bedroom stands a rack containing Gabis and Rivkis shoes; their smart leather ones for synagogue, his trainers, her easy shoes for around town. They have been left here in accordance with Jewish tradition, Berkowitz explains.

It is Tisha BAv, a Jewish day of mourning for the destruction of two Jerusalem temples about 2,000 years ago. On the roof, Berkowitz sits and begins to recite a traditional prayer. They attacked us and besieged us, our enemies, he half-sings, the city spread out beneath him. They made impure what was pure. There is no comfort. The visitors look at the ground or into the distance. Hashem, he says, using one of the Jewish names for God, return us. We will repent and you will return us. May you reinstate the glorious days of old.

Source

Jewish News via SMS
——————-
Jewish Breaking News Blog via Facebook | Twitter | Friendfeed | Jewish Related Incidents

CDR Financial Products of Beverly Hills, 3 executives charged in bid-rigging case

November 1, 2009 by SF

CDR Financial Products Inc. of Beverly Hills, its founder and two other employees of the advisory firm were indicted Thursday by a federal grand jury on charges of conspiring to rig bidding on investment contracts sold to local governments.

The indictment in U.S. District Court in New York alleges that CDR and its employees, who ran the auctions for the investment work, awarded the deals to favored firms in exchange for kickbacks. The government alleges that the conspiracy cost taxpayers by allowing the banks to pay below-market rates.

“The Justice Department is committed to protecting the competitive process and will hold accountable individuals and companies who participate in illegal and anticompetitive conduct,” Assistant U.S. Atty. Gen. Christine Varney, who heads the antitrust division, said in a statement.

Indicted were CDR founder David Rubin; Zevi “Stewart” Wolmark, CDR’s former chief financial officer and managing director; and Evan Zarefsky, CDR’s vice president. The charges are the first to result from a more than three-year investigation into the municipal bond market that has drawn in more than a dozen banks, insurers and local government advisors.

Allan Ripp, a spokesman for CDR, said the firm hasn’t had a chance to fully review the complaint. He dismissed allegations that the firm participated in a conspiracy. Rubin’s attorney, Donald Etra, said his client would defend against the charges.

“We believe the indictment has no merit,” Etra said. “The bottom line is that David Rubin did nothing wrong.”

The investigation and the charges filed against CDR and its employees center on so-called guaranteed investment contracts, which local governments buy with the proceeds of municipal bonds. Under the deals, banks and insurance companies agree to pay a fixed rate of return until the money is needed to pay for construction projects.

The allegations are reminiscent of the yield-burning scandal of the 1990s, when Wall Street banks overcharged local governments for Treasury bonds they purchased with their own bond money. Securities firms agreed to pay more than $170 million to settle SEC allegations of yield burning.

The Justice Department’s investigation into bid rigging is ongoing. Bank of America Corp. in 2007 agreed to cooperate with the department in exchange for leniency. Others, including JPMorgan Chase & Co. and UBS, have disclosed they may face charges by the Justice Department or the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the investigation.

A conspiracy to fix prices on the investments would have cost taxpayers by giving them lower returns than they would receive in a competitive auction. It would also cost the federal government, whose regulations require issuers of tax-exempt bonds to pay as taxes much of what they earn on the investments.

“This case is fundamentally about collusion, the illegal rigging of a purportedly competitive bidding process,” Joseph M. Demarest Jr., assistant director in charge of the FBI office in New York, said in a statement. “The result was lower rates of return on the investment of bond proceeds for the state and local governments that hired CDR.

“In a climate of economic austerity, the conduct of the defendants and co-conspirators seems particularly predatory,” Demarest said.

According to the indictment, the CDR employees decided who would win investment contracts in advance and solicited sham bids from other institutions to cover it up. In exchange, according to the indictment, the firm received kickbacks, masked as fees for other transactions, on at least 10 occasions from 2001 to August 2005. The amounts ranged from $4,500 to $475,000, according to the indictment.

A bid-rigging count against Rubin and the other employees carries a maximum 10-year prison term, prosecutors said. Other charges include conspiracy, wire fraud, making of false statements and a fraudulent bank transaction count. Not every defendant is accused of each crime. CDR faces a maximum fine of $100 million for bid rigging.

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fiw-cdr-indict30-2009oct30,0,919825.story

Once a Gem, Lev Leviev’s Firm Loses Sparkle

November 1, 2009 by SF

TEL AVIV — In May 2007, Israeli diamond magnate Lev Leviev was on a roll. A subsidiary of his real-estate company Africa Israel Investments Ltd. raised $1.4 billion on the London Stock Exchange. That came just a few days after a U.S. unit paid $525 million for the New York Times building in Manhattan.

But now his company is the biggest casualty among a number of large, Israeli conglomerates that borrowed heavily on Israel’s fledgling bond market. They are struggling to pay back that money — much of it owed to local pension funds and insurers.

After announcing to reporters …

Source

Jewish News via SMS
——————-
Jewish Breaking News Blog via Facebook | Twitter | Friendfeed | Jewish Related Incidents

Final Member of Hitler’s Inner Circle Dies at 96

November 1, 2009 by SF

The last member of Adolf Hitler’s notorious inner circle has died at age 96, leaving behind instructions to publish a manuscript about his time spent alongside the German dictator, the Telegraph reported.

Fritz Darges was present for all major conferences, social engagements and policy announcements during World War II and experts believe his memoir could disprove claims by some disputed historians that Hitler never directly ordered the extermination of the Jews, and that the “final solution” was the brainchild of SS chief Heinrich Himmler.

Darges rose to the rank of lieutenant colonel and thought Hitler was a genius. It was rumored that the dictator’s sister-in-law Gretel Braun was interested in him, but he “didn’t think he should become the brother-in-law of the Fuhrer.”

In 1944, Darges’ relationship with Hitler changed at a conference when Hitler ordered him to destroy a fly that buzzed around the room.

Darges suggested that, as it was an “airborne pest,” the job should go to the Luftwaffe staff officer, Nicolaus von Below.

Enraged, Hitler dismissed Darges, yelling, “You’re for the eastern front,” and Darges was sent to combat.

Darges died at his home in Celle, northern Germany.

Source

Jewish News via SMS
——————-
Jewish Breaking News Blog via Facebook | Twitter | Friendfeed | Jewish Related Incidents

Dix Hills condos fined $10,000 for stopping women from displaying mezuzah on her front door

November 1, 2009 by SF

A Jewish woman from Dix Hills who says her condominium complex discriminated against her by stopping her from displaying a 4-inch mezuzah on her front door has won a case taken on by state Attorney General Andrew Cuomo.

His office ordered the homeowner’s association at Stone Ridge Estates in Dix Hills to pay a $10,000 fine and rewrite its bylaws so they “do not discriminate against residents because of their religion.”

The case was brought to Cuomo’s office by Patti Werner, who moved into the complex earlier this year.

“This country guarantees every individual the right to express his or her religious beliefs,” Cuomo said in a statement. “And New York State, with our fair housing laws, guarantees that no resident will be discriminated against based on that expression.”

He added: “The practices employed by the Dix Hills Homeowners Association went against the fundamental protections and promises of our laws, and I commend them for reforming their bylaws and practices to ensure that no resident will be the victim of this kind of discrimination.”

Lawrence Gresser, the developer of the condominium project who is also listed in the attorney general’s settlement as the president and sponsor of the homeowners association, did not immediately return phone messages seeking comment.

An employee at a construction trailer on the site, who residents said runs daily operations at the complex, also declined to comment and said Gresser would not comment.

Patrick McCormick, an East Meadow attorney listed in the papers as the association’s attorney, did not immediately return telephone messages seeking comment.

Cuomo’s office said it investigated after receiving a complaint that residents were told to “either take down their mezuzahs or purchase a screen door costing between $300 to $500 dollars to conceal the object.”

connections
Stone Ridge Estates bylaws “prohibited residents from changing or altering the exterior of their home without permission, which includes the affixing of signs, advertisements, or statuary,” Cuomo’s office said in the statement. “However, the complaint alleged that homeowners who exhibited larger objects, such as wreaths, were not asked to remove the displayed items.”

Cuomo’s office said when it contacted the association, it “readily agreed to change its policies and comply with the law.”

A mezuzah “is a public sign and affirmation of core Jewish values,” said Rabbi Howard R. Buechler of the Dix Hills Jewish Center, who was involved in the case. “It is placed on the doorposts of the Jewish home to remind all who enter that the joyous values and traditions of Judaism should be lived in the home – and in hearts and deeds daily.”

It is made up of two parts – a small decorated container and, most importantly, a handwritten parchment rolled inside containing two passages from the Biblical book of Deuteronomy, Buechler said. It is placed at entranceways, bedroom doorways, and other rooms, except bathrooms, he said.

Werner could not be reached for comment.

Source

Jewish News via SMS
——————-
Jewish Breaking News Blog via Facebook | Twitter | Friendfeed | Jewish Related Incidents

Professor: Yigal Amir’s Life is in Danger

November 1, 2009 by SF

(IsraelNN.com) Professor Aryeh Zaritsky of Bar Ilan University believes that Yigal Amir, the man convicted for the assassination of former Prime Minister Yitzchak Rabin, is in grave danger. “They are going to assassinate Yigal Amir in prison,” he told Arutz-Sheva radio.

Zaritsky is part of an independent investigative committee that is looking into the Rabin assassination. The committee, which bears the name of famed nationalist broadcaster Adir Zik, has concluded that Rabin was not killed by Amir, but rather was murdered as part of a conspiracy meant to malign Israel’s political Right.

Yigal Amir’s testimony was a critical component of the investigation, Zaritsky said. Amir has spoken to Zik investigative committee member Natan Gefen – an interview that Zaritsky fears will cost him his life.

Of the Gefen interview, Zaritsky said, “Yigal Amir is convinced that his bullets were not the ones that killed Yitzchak Rabin.” The committee has gathered additional evidence indicating that Amir did not kill Rabin, according to Zaritsky.

“There was a conspiracy against the right wing, but something went wrong, they staged the murder of a prime minister and something went wrong,” he continued.

Zaritsky believes that pathological evidence is available proving that Rabin was not killed by Amir, but that the evidence has been covered up by senior state officials. Among those he named as having refused to release information were Attorney General Menachem Mazuz and infamous chief pathologist Professor Yehuda Hiss.

He lamented the fact that even among nationalist Israelis, few openly identify with the Zik committee or its findings, for fear of being delegitimized. “They don’t understand that they will always be delegitimized, no matter what their stance” on the Rabin killing, he said.

Source

Jewish News via SMS
——————-
Jewish Breaking News Blog via Facebook | Twitter | Friendfeed | Jewish Related Incidents